Talk:Keywords: Difference between revisions
(Could really use some feedback here...) |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Does anyone have any opinions on this page? Formatting, content, or even how it should function as a whole? I don't mind doing it alone, but I'd like some feedback to help improve it. -[[User:ZeroGman|ZeroGman]] | Does anyone have any opinions on this page? Formatting, content, or even how it should function as a whole? I don't mind doing it alone, but I'd like some feedback to help improve it. -[[User:ZeroGman|ZeroGman]] | ||
Just finished S and noticed this page is getting quite long. What about breaking up the thing into 28 different pages? 1 for table of content, 27 for separate pages (Although W,X,Y,Z and other smaller ones could be combined. --[[User:ZeroGman|ZeroGman]] 19:57, 3 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
So far, this is looking quite good. I might add in some keywords myself if time allows. --[[User:Iindigo|Iindigo]] 22:51, 3 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Thanks, I was thinking though, what about making separate pages for different letters? I don't have a big problem with large pages and it shouldn't be a problem really since images can not be added as of right now. Linking would be a lot prettier too. The only drawback would be really large TOC on some pages, like S or M. --[[User:ZeroGman|ZeroGman]] 20:51, 4 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
I may start from the top and meet you somewhere in the middle. Kind of like the USA's Transcontinental Railroad. --[[User:Zalis116|Zalis116]], 12 March 2009 | |||
I like the current method. All on one page. Then if someone doesn't know what group they need, they can do a ctrl+f and find a related word for that category. Then A-Z is all in a single list. I don't think page length matters so much, I guess we can decide once it's all done? --[[User:Chiyachan|Chiyachan]] 12:07, 20 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:07, 20 August 2009
I'll start from the bottom up, remember to only modify the first list since the second one will be used as a reference of sorts -ZeroGman
Does anyone have any opinions on this page? Formatting, content, or even how it should function as a whole? I don't mind doing it alone, but I'd like some feedback to help improve it. -ZeroGman
Just finished S and noticed this page is getting quite long. What about breaking up the thing into 28 different pages? 1 for table of content, 27 for separate pages (Although W,X,Y,Z and other smaller ones could be combined. --ZeroGman 19:57, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
So far, this is looking quite good. I might add in some keywords myself if time allows. --Iindigo 22:51, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, I was thinking though, what about making separate pages for different letters? I don't have a big problem with large pages and it shouldn't be a problem really since images can not be added as of right now. Linking would be a lot prettier too. The only drawback would be really large TOC on some pages, like S or M. --ZeroGman 20:51, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
I may start from the top and meet you somewhere in the middle. Kind of like the USA's Transcontinental Railroad. --Zalis116, 12 March 2009
I like the current method. All on one page. Then if someone doesn't know what group they need, they can do a ctrl+f and find a related word for that category. Then A-Z is all in a single list. I don't think page length matters so much, I guess we can decide once it's all done? --Chiyachan 12:07, 20 August 2009 (UTC)